de_DE

Uwe Techt (en)

  • Blog
  • Contact

CORE solution for successful change management (4)

CORE solution for successful change management (4)

by Uwe Techt / Wednesday, 28 January 2015 / Published in Project- and Multiprojectmanagement

 

CORE-Grafik-EN


If expectations are not being met, they may need to be reset. In that case, the implementation
should be re-evaluated. It is important to fix problems early on. It is also important not to pretend that things are fine when they aren’t.

The line from Validation to Urgency indicates the ongoing need to understand and analyze the level of urgency. If people say that one thing is important (for example, cycle times) but behave as if another is important (for example, costs), we may need to rethink the implementation. If the implementation produces value and apparently reduces the level of urgency, we may need to bolster the urgency with some additional actions, at least until the new processes are well established.

Many other cross-connections that are not represented in the diagram can occur during the CORE cycle. For example, expectations may need periodic adjustments based on the results of planning and implementation.

As the cycle continues, expectations continue to be set and reset and commitment, value, and validation are built. All the elements may occur in parallel. Implementing and measuring, for example, do not normally stop as we communicate and replan. Some steps, such as replanning, can be skipped if they are not needed.

I hope this overview over the CORE solution has intrigued you – and inspired you to test this method in your next change initiative. I would love to hear about your experiences with CORE. Please post them here so that the readers of this blog can learn from you.

In my next blog I will outline how you can use CORE in implementation planning.

____________

CORE: developed by ProChain Solutions
This Article is based on Rob Newbold, Making Change Stick, from the book Cox III, James F.,
and Schleier Jr., John G.,eds. Theory of constraints handbook. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., 2010. p. 108-112

 

Tagged under: Change Management, QuiStain, Theory of Constraints

What you can read next

You Give Me Fever
Effective Steps for an innovative Company
Why do so many Change Initiatives fail? (1)

Categories

Recent Posts

  • A Short Introduction to the Theory of Constraints

    A while back, an acquaintance asked me to summa...
  • Bullshit Jobs – What About Bullshit Projects?

    Bullshit Jobs is the title of David Graeber’s b...
  • The Agile Supply Chain

    Staying afloat in today’s market means being fa...
  • Is the OEE (Overall Equipment Efficiency) Metric a good thing?

    At first glance, how can it be bad. After all, ...
  • The Quickest Way to Improved Flow 2: Fixing the right mistakes

    In the first part of this series, we explained ...

Comments

  • Antifragililty and TOC by Uwe Tech | Theory Of ... on Antifragility: be ready for anything

Archive

Tag Cloud

buffer management buffer penetration CCPM change Change Management Company Culture Constraint Corporate Culture Critical Chain Projectmanagement Critical Chain Projektmanagement Customers Decisive Competitive Edge Eli Goldratt Five Focusing Steps Flow Focus Goldratt Guestpost holistic vision Learning from Experience lessons learned Management Management Focus Mulitproject Multi-tasking Multi project Multiproject Management Multitasking production Productivity Increase Projectmanagement Project Management Projects that Flow Psychology QuiStain Rudolf Burkhard Strategies and Tactics Strategy&Tactic Strategy and Tactics system based project management sytem based project management Theory of Constraints time sheets time sheets unnecessary and damaging TOC
  • GET SOCIAL

© 2019 Uwe Techt (Imprint | Privacy Policy)

TOP